My earliest memory of this epic story is the television series that was playing in Doordarshan during my school days. I vaguely remember the episodes and the story somehow did not stick with me. I had grown to think of 'Ramayana' as a religious book, one that never appealed to me.
During my recent trip to India, I read 'The Ramayana' by R.K. Narayan. It is a small, crisp version of the epic as written by Kambar. For the first time I enjoyed the story and was awed and inspired by the whole plot.
The language that Narayan uses is very simple but it captures the imposing grandiose of the saga. I am astounded that Valmiki wrote his version almost 2400 years ago, which is believed to be the earliest version. The idealized image of Rama described by Valmiki was later presented as an incarnation of Lord Vishnu by the later versions. 'Ramayana' is made up to be a very sacred and religious story, but it appeals to me as a great fantasy adventure, romantic thriller that encompasses melodrama and the civics of monarchy.
During my recent trip to India, I read 'The Ramayana' by R.K. Narayan. It is a small, crisp version of the epic as written by Kambar. For the first time I enjoyed the story and was awed and inspired by the whole plot.
The language that Narayan uses is very simple but it captures the imposing grandiose of the saga. I am astounded that Valmiki wrote his version almost 2400 years ago, which is believed to be the earliest version. The idealized image of Rama described by Valmiki was later presented as an incarnation of Lord Vishnu by the later versions. 'Ramayana' is made up to be a very sacred and religious story, but it appeals to me as a great fantasy adventure, romantic thriller that encompasses melodrama and the civics of monarchy.
